M&HR
  • HOME
  • About Us
  • HR & Employment Law Classes - Every Fortnight
  • Our Services
  • Training Programmes
    • Microsoft Excel Training - 2025
  • HR Books / Online Store
  • HR Blog
    • Kannada Blog
  • Join HR Online Groups
  • Collaborate with M&HR
  • Contact Us
  • HOME
  • About Us
  • HR & Employment Law Classes - Every Fortnight
  • Our Services
  • Training Programmes
    • Microsoft Excel Training - 2025
  • HR Books / Online Store
  • HR Blog
    • Kannada Blog
  • Join HR Online Groups
  • Collaborate with M&HR
  • Contact Us
M&HR

Doctrine of Estoppel

3/2/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
Estoppel is a legal principle that prevents someone from arguing or asserting a right that contradicts what they previously agreed to or said. Put, estoppel prevents one person from contradicting an action or statement from the past. Estoppel ensures that a person stays true to their word and does not unfairly damage someone else so, if person A must adhere to their word if they make a promise to person B and later rescind it.
In various Corporates, we come across situations, may be Finance, Marketing, Supply-chain, and as well as in HR. Enforcement of contractual terms of an employee, litigations before labour adjudications, long-term wage agreements, and even in domestic enquiries. The intention behind this article is to enlighten all employees holding responsible positions in all disciplines in the Corporate, since, many times, it may go unnoticed.
​
It has already been noted that under the "The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 [Evidence Act), hereinafter referred to as Act, there are certain facts which need not be proved and there are some facts which cannot be proved because the Act, would not allow evidence of such facts. An estoppel is a principle, whereby a party is precluded from denying the existence of some state of facts which has formerly admitted. The foundation of the doctrine is that a person cannot approbate and reprobate at the same time;

Under The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, sections 121 to 123 based on the principle what is called "doctrine of estoppel".
 
Sec. 121. Estoppel.-
When one person has, by his declaration, act or omission, intentionally caused or permitted another person to believe a thing to be true and to act upon such belief, neither he nor his representative shall be allowed, in any suit or proceeding between himself and such person or his representative, to deny the truth of that thing.
 
Illustration
A intentionally and falsely leads B to believe that certain land belongs to A, and thereby induces B to buy and pay for it.

The land afterwards becomes the property of A, and A seeks to set aside the sale on the ground that, at the time of the sale, he had no title. He must not be allowed to prove his want of title.

Section 121 lays down that when one person has, either in word or by conduct, intentionally caused a person to believe to a thing to be true and to act upon such belief or to alter his position, neither he nor his representative in any suit or proceeding will be allowed to say that the representation was false. Estoppel is a principle of law by which a person is held bound by the representation, made by him or arising out of his conduct.
 
Another illustration;
Mr. X was selected based on his personal profile for the position of a GM in Y Company. Mr. X had declared that he possessed the experience and managerial skills having worked in three highly reputed organisations. Along with the profile he had enclosed service certificates as well accordingly, contract of service was executed between Mr. X & Y Company. Importantly, the terms like, if at any time, while the company reserves its right upon pre-employment verification, if indicates that Mr. X has produced false documents and withheld all information with an intention of personal gains, the contract will be terminated and Mr. X is required to pay penalty compensation equivalent to three months package to Y company. Pre employments showed complete negativity and were found to be false. Accordingly, upon the termination, he failed to pay penal damages as accepted by him. He expressed his innocence and to pardon him against the claim of damages. The Y company filed a civil suit against him for recovery of penal damages. Now, here, the doctrine of estoppel under the Evidence Act comes into picture. His defensive evidences are not admissible.

We come across similar situations, like, in the domestic enquiry, enforcement of contractual obligations, like, intellectual property, protection of trade secrets, innovations, non-disclosure, non-competence, long term wage agreements etc.

Hence this Doctrine which is a powerful tool in safe guarding the business interests of any company.
The main ingredients of estoppel as defined in section 121 i.e., estoppel bucket are:
(1) There must be some representation,
(2) The representation must be made with the intention to be acted upon,
(3) The representation must have been acted upon.
 
What are the essential conditions for the applicability of section 121 of the Evidence Act?
i) There must have been a representation by a person to another person, which may be in any form - a declaration or an act or an omission.
ii) Such representation must have been of the existence of a fact, and not of future promises or intention.
iii) The representation must have been meant to have been relied upon.
iv) There must have been belief on the part of the other party in its truth.
v) There must have been some action on the faith of that declaration, act or omission. In other words, such declaration, etc., must have actually caused the other person to act on the faith of it and to alter his position to his prejudice or detriment.
vi) The misrepresentation or conduct or omission must have been the proximate cause of leading the other party to act to his prejudice.
vii) The person claiming the benefit of an estoppel must show that he was not aware of the true state of things. There can be no estoppel if such a person was aware of the true state of affairs or if he had means of such knowledge.
viii) Only the person to whom the representation was made or for whom it was designed, can avail of the doctrine. The burden of proving estoppel lies on such person.

The above are the essential ingredients are as per the judicial pronouncement by Hon'ble Supreme Court, Chhaganlal Keshavlal Mehta v. Patel Narandas Haribhai : (1982) 1 SCC 223: AIR 1982 SC 121: 1982.

There are three types of "Estoppel”.
1. Promissory Estoppel
"Where one party has, by his words or conduct, made to the other a promise or assurance which was intended to affect the legal relations between them and to be acted on accordingly, then, once the other party has taken him at his word and acted on it, the party who gave the promise or assurance cannot afterwards be allowed to revert to the previous legal relationship as if no such promise or assurance had been made by him, but he must accept their legal relations subject to the qualification which he himself has so introduced, even though it is not supported in point of law by any consideration, but only by his word."
 
2. Estoppel of tenant; and of licensee of person in possession.
No tenant of immovable property or person claiming through such tenant, shall, during the continuance of the tenancy, be permitted to deny that the landlord of such tenant had, at the beginning of the tenancy, a title to such immovable property, and no person who came upon any immovable property by the licence of the person in possession thereof, shall be permitted to deny that such person had a title to such possession at the time when such licence was given.

"A tenant may not dispute the right of his landlord saying that he had nothing in the property”. The section provides that a person who comes into an immovable property taking possession from a person whom he accepts as the landlord, is not permitted to say as against his landlord that he had no title to the property at the commencement of the tenancy."

In Supreme Court verdict in Rita Lal v. Raj Kumar Singh, MANU/SC/0813/2002: AIR 2002 SC 3341: 2002 AIR SCW 3887

The rent note was proved to be signed by tenant. Tenant admitted the title of landlord in his disposition made on oath in earlier judicial proceeding of plea of tenant denying the title of landlord in the eviction suit raised for seeking leave to defend does not amount to raising tribal issue as he was estopped from raising the same. Tenant would not be entitled to permission to defend.

In the case of S.K. Sharma v Mahesh Kumar Verma AIR 2002 SC 3294, the respondent, a railway servant, was estopped from challenging the railway administration's title over the premises allocated to him as an official residence as long as he remained in possession, pursuant to Section 122 of the Evidence Act.
 
Sec 123. Estoppel of acceptor of bill of exchange, bailee or licensee.
No acceptor of a bill of exchange shall be permitted to deny that the drawer had the authority to draw such bill or to endorse it; nor shall any Bailee or licensee be permitted to deny that his bailer or licensor had, at the time when the bailment or license commenced, authority to make such bailment or grant such licence. Examples: Bank currency note, Bank draft, promissory note, note between the seller and a buyer etc.
​

Now let us examine the difference between "Estoppel & Res juidicata"
Picture
Here, we can also examine the difference between "Estoppel & Waiver."
Picture
Courtesy:
Manupatra
Business Manager
March 2025
Picture
Picture
Doctrine of Estoppel
File Size: 3203 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File


K. Vittala Rao Books

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    General
    HR Jobs
    HR Videos
    Human Resource
    Industrial Relations
    Interviews
    Labour Law
    Personality Development
    PoSH (Sexual Harassment)
    ಕನ್ನಡ ಲೇಖನಗಳು


    Picture

    HR Learning and Skill Building Academy

    Join WhatsApp Channel

    Stay updated and informed by joining our WhatsApp group for HR and Employment Law Classes - Every Fortnight. The Zoom link for the sessions will be shared directly in the group.
    Picture
    Join Here

    M&HR Solutions Private Limited

    Human Resources And Labour Law Classes

    Leaders Talk

    Picture

    MHR LEARNING ACADEMY

    Get it on Google Play store
    Download App Here
    Online App Courses

    Picture
    Join WhatsApp

    Picture
    50,000 HR PROFESSIONALS ARE CONNECTED THROUGH OUR NIRATHANKA HR GROUPS.
    YOU CAN ALSO JOIN AND PARTICIPATE IN OUR GROUP DISCUSSIONS.
    Join HR Online Groups



    RSS Feed


    Human Resources And Labour Law Classes


site map


Site

  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • COLLABORATE WITH M&HR
  • HR BLOG
  • HR LEARNING AND SKILL BUILDING ACADEMY
  • ​VIDEOS
  • HR & EMPLOYMENT LAW CLASSES - EVERY FORTNIGHT​​​

PUBLICATIONS

  • LEADER'S TALK​
  • ​TRANSLATING & TYPING

Job

  • JOB PORTAL​
  • FREELANCE TRANSLATOR

HR SERVICES

  • COMPLIANCE SUPPORT
  • CONSULTING
  • CONTRACT LABOUR
  • CONTRACT LABOUR LICENCE & CONSULTING​​​
  • PAYROLL
  • RECRUITMENT & STAFFING SERVICES
  • STAFFING - WHITE & BLUE COLLAR
  • ​STANDING ORDERS CERTIFICATION

OTHER SERVICES

  • APARTMENT RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION​

Training 

  • ​TRAINING PROGRAMMES

POSH

  • OUR ASSOCIATES
  • OUR CLIENTS
  • POSH
  • POSH BLOG
  • ​WANT TO BECOME AN EXTERNAL MEMBER FOR AN IC?

​​NGO & CSR

  • ​CSR
  • TREE PLANTATION PROJECT

Our Other Website:

  • WWW.NIRUTAPUBLICATIONS.ORG​

subscribe 


HR and Employment Law Classes - Every Fortnight

50,000 HR PROFESSIONALS ARE CONNECTED ​THROUGH OUR HR GROUPS. 
​YOU CAN ALSO JOIN AND PARTICIPATE IN OUR GROUP DISCUSSIONS.
Are you looking to enhance your knowledge of HR and labor laws? Join Nirathanka's HR and Employment Law Classes-Every Fortnight—a one-of-a-kind opportunity to learn from experienced professionals and industry experts.
Join Here

MHR Learning Academy

Picture
Picture
Download App Here
Picture
Online Courses Available on Our App
Picture


Copyright : MHRSPL-2021, website designed and developed by : www.nirutapublications.org.